Archive for March, 2008

Now AIR for Linux; Adobe Teams with Linux

Monday, March 31st, 2008

Today onwards, the penguin too will get a taste of the AIR (Adobe Integrated Runtime) alpha version. And, Adobe Systems has joined the Linux Foundation to focus on Linux for Web 2.0 Applications.

Adobe’s AIR is meant to enable developers create RIA (Rich Internet Applications) and take Web applications to the desktop and store data offline. AIR will enable developers to create RIAs on the desktop using Web technologies such as HTML, Ajax, PDF, Flash, and Flex that they already employ. A free and open-source technology, it will allow companies with Websites to inhabit a permanent spot on people’s desktops, in a way similar to Google’s widgets. For consumers, AIR will reduce the wait time for downloading images and data, because the desktop is constantly updated while the computer is online.

Version 1.0 of AIR was made available last year for the Windows and Mac OS platforms, however release for Linux was deferred due to wait on the core Flash Player’s support for Linux to be finalized, as per the Adobe Web site (last year).

Major news that follows is Adobe collaborating with the Linux Foundation (LF), a non-profit organization that works towards the development of Linux. Through this association, Adobe plans to work with the involved community to ensure Adobe RIA technologies are compatible across the Linux software platform; support for RIA on Linux has been limited until now. Adobe deems LF as a valuable resource that provides a platform to be able to accomplish this mission, as quoted on the LF Web page.

In order to install RIAs for the browser and the desktop, Adobe currently provides major RIA technologies for Linux users such as Adobe Flash Player and now also Adobe AIR.

Article source - http://www.techtree.com/India/News/Now_AIR_for_Linux_Adobe_Teams_with_Linux/551-88069-580.html

For more info please visit us at - Linux Application Development

Yahoo targets women with new ‘Shine’ site

Monday, March 31st, 2008

Yahoo on Monday will launch a new Web site aimed at women. The site, called “Shine,” will feature original blogs and content from major publishing partners including Conde Nast, Hearst, and Time.

The site is Yahoo’s latest foray into vertical sites, which include the popular Yahoo News and Yahoo Finance, as well as Sports and Entertainment, and the much less popular Yahoo Tech and Yahoo Green. This site is Yahoo’s first targeting a specific audience and not just a topic.

Yahoo aims to be the top destination site in the lifestyles category, said Amy Iorio, general manager of Lifestyles at Yahoo. Women as a demographic is a good target, particularly given the number of women who use Yahoo (40 million women between the ages of 25 and 54 every month) and the fact that females tend to blog more than males.

“This is really a key audience for Yahoo,” she said. “We’ve been calling them ‘chief household officers’ internally.”

Yahoo’s efforts at doing original content haven’t all panned out, but this site is more of a hybrid. Articles and original blogs will come from a range of sources, including Glamour, Epicurious.com, Style.com, InStyle, Cosmopolitan, Harper’s Bazaar, Women’s Health, and Good Housekeeping.

Eight editors are overseeing the various sections (such as home, parenting, fashion, culture, and career) and the editor in chief is Brandon Holley, former editor in chief of Jane magazine.

Shine readers will be able to start their own blogs and that content, if deemed worthy, can end up as some of the featured content in different sections on the site.

You will also be able to get to your Yahoo Mail on Shine, and there is integration with Yahoo Search, Food, Health, and Astrology. But there could be even more integration with things like Yahoo Messenger and Yahoo Answers.

The site will compete with iVillage and fashion- and celebrity-news heavy Glam.com, but its content partners and editors will set it apart, Holley said. Shine will distinguish itself by having more of an editorial voice than the other sites and by interacting more with readers, she said.

On a quick glance, Shine looks more aesthetically appealing and less cluttered than the rival sites, despite the fact that Yahoo is not exactly known for simple site design. The site will be at http://shine.yahoo.com.

Article source- http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9905786-7.html?tag=nefd.top

For more info please visit us at – Offshore software Development Company

YouTube rolls out usage analytics

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

Google offers analysis for YouTube video uploaders

YouTube users can now access usage statistics for the videos they upload, such as where viewers are geographically located and how they found the clips.

The feature, called YouTube Insight, is designed to help those who want detailed metrics for their YouTube campaigns. Earlier this month, YouTube sales team manager Brian Cusack said that the Google unit was planning to provide its members with more data about video viewership.

“YouTube has enormous amounts of data, but not great reporting on that data yet,” Cusack said during a keynote speech at the eRetailer Summit in Miami.

Now, marketers will have a better understanding of clips’ reach and effectiveness at boosting brand awareness and sales, according to YouTube.

“With YouTube Insight, we’ve turned YouTube into one of the world’s largest focus groups. Insight will help advertisers optimise their marketing efforts, determine how successful they were, and discover previously unknown marketing opportunities,” an official YouTube blog posting reads.

The metrics will also give a better understanding of clips’ popularity and viewership to people who upload videos for fun without commercial or marketing purposes.

YouTube Insight doesn’t collect or display personally identifiable information on viewers, but rather provides uploaders with aggregated data on viewers’ geographic location and on the time and day when clips were viewed, a Google spokesman said via email.

Google will “soon” turn a feature to let uploaders discover how viewers found a clip, such as via a Google search, browsing YouTube’s “related videos” suggestions or clicking on an email or website link, he said.

Article source- http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?newsid=20828

For more info please visit us at – Search engine optimization services & software development

Beyond Linkbait with Media and Blogger Relations - SES NY

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

On Thursday I’ll be presenting on a panel, “Beyond Linkbat: Getting Authoritative Mentions Online” with Chris Boggs and Sally Falkow. Sage Lewis will be moderating. I think this type of session is very timely as search engines begin to put more and more emphasis on higher quality and editorial link sources and less on sources that are easier to manipulate. Increasing competition online also means online branding and influence increase in their importance.

Online PR is a perfect solution for a topic that shines less light on tactics du jour, althought linkbaiting still works well, and more on leveraging the media and centers of influence online. I’ve written about how SEO and Online PR can work together in the past, but in this presentation I’ll be focusing on the Do’s and Don’ts of media relations and blogger relations.

Here’s a highlight to give you a taste of what I’ll be talking about and may be helpful as an outline for any bloggers that might be covering the session.

When working with online public relations programs, we typically distinguish PR activities into “push” tactics, which are methods of reaching out such as by sending out press released through a wire service, pitching journalists and bloggers via email and phone, distributing news information through RSS and a few clever uses of PPC. Alternatively, “pull” tactics are centered around optimizing content so it is easy for journalists and bloggers doing research to find.

The fundamentals that make blogger relations and media relations efforts successful center on relevance and relationships. One of the biggest complaints both journalists and bloggers have in regard to news stories that are pitched to them is that the stories are simply not relevant. More on how to fix that in a bit.

The other fundamental, relationships, is very key because credible, trustworthy and sound-bite savvy expers and resources are good/difficult to come by. Too many SEOs trying to pitch blogs or even mainstream media approach it like typical link building - a one time event. The reality is, that publication or blog would love to find a great resource they can cite and link to over and over again. While the SEO value of links from the same domain name diminishes with frequency, they are still traffic driving opportunities.

Here is a summary of the DO’s:

  • Do your homework
  • Be relevant
  • Understand the difference: journalists vs bloggers
  • Make it easy
  • Publicize your publicity

And here are the DON’Ts:

  • Don’t be sloppy or spammy
  • Don’t be a one trick pony
  • Don’t be arrogant
  • Don’t ignore multiple promotion channels
  • Don’t forget to say thank you

There’s a tremendous amount of opportunity for companies to develop win-win-win relationships with the media and bloggers. The readership of those web sites get useful content. Bloggers and journalists develop a relationship with a credible source that will help them write better stories and blog posts. The company wins by being mentioned authoritatively on a regular basis.

Key points: Do your homework, be personal and relevant in your pitching. Make it easy for the journalist or blogger to use you as an expert or content source and by all means, develop a relationship that results in a win for everyone involved.

The “Beyond Linkbait: Getting Authoritative Mentions Online” session is this Thursday 3/20 at the NY Hilton, Sutton South room at 11:15 am. The panel and I hope to see you there!

Article source- http://www.toprankblog.com/2008/03/beyond-linkbait-ses-ny/

For more info please visit us at – offshore software development & Web Development Company

Google February Paid Clicks Lousy (Again)*

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

A source says Comscore has finally released its February “US paid clicks” report for Google (GOOG), Yahoo (YHOO), et al. We have not seen the report, but our source relays the following:

Google had 515mm US paid clicks in February, which is up only 3% year over year. At first glance, this appears to be a slight–slight–improvement from the horrific January report, which was flat y/y at 532mm clicks. However, Comscore did not adjust for the Leap Year (29 days vs 28), so this likely accounted for the entire increase.* Both months show a severe slowdown from Q4:

Oct: +37%
Nov: +27%
Dec: +12%
Jan: 0%
Feb: +3% [Does not adjust for Leap Year 29 days vs 28. Therefore pro forma 0%]

 

Our source believes Wall Street was looking for 5%-7% growth in Google’s US paid clicks and that this report will likely cause the stock to trade down. For basic queries (versus paid clicks), Google US was up 31% and Google International was up 31%.

RBC has already weighed in on the results:

Overall deceleration from 30% in 4Q to flattish in 1Q continues to be a
concern… While its impossible to use comScore’s paid click number to
accurately predict Google revenue with any confidence, there does appear
to some co-specific self-inflicted reduction in ads, and these trends
can’t be ignored completely.

This datapoint will not have as much shock value as the Jan data, as
some investors were bracing for a negative y/y comp….our thesis on co
is unchanged, we still blv co’s int’l biz is strong but we’re cautious
on US growth relative to expectations in 08 and blv there is downside to
cons ests (cowen & ubs cut earlier this week)

Meanwhile, our source says Yahoo came in at 225mln paid clicks, which is up 5% y/y. This compares to January up 15% (vs +7% in Dec). Our source says this is a slight disappointment, as Yahoo’s click-through rate did not improve and the company saw a sequential slowdown from Jan.

We continue to believe that Google’s full-year 2008 estimates will have to come down. It is hard to see the stock rising sustainably until consensus estimates bottom and then start rising again.

Arricle source- http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/3/google_february_paid_clicks_lousy_again_

For more info please visit us at- SEO services & Web Development

Google Offers Robots.txt Generator

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

Google’s rolled out a new tool at Google Webmaster Central, a robots.txt generator. It’s designed to allow site owners to easily create a robots.txt file, one of the two main ways (along with the meta robots tag) to prevent search engines from indexing content. Robots.txt generators aren’t new. You can find many of them out there by searching. But this is the first time a major search engine has provided a generator tool of its own.

It’s nice to see the addition. Robots.txt files aren’t complicated to create. You can write them using a text editor such as notepad with just a few simple commands. But they can still be scary or hard for some site owners to contemplate.

To access the tool, log-in to your Google Webmaster Tools account, then click on the Tools menu option on the left-hand side of the screen after you select one of your verified sites. You’ll see a “Generate robots.txt” link among the tool options. That’s what you want.

By default, the tool is designed to let you create a robots.txt file to allow all robots into your site. That’s kind of odd. By default, all robots will come into your site. If you want them, then there’s no need to have a robots.txt file at all. It’s like pinning a note to your chest reminding yourself to breathe. Promise, you’ll keep breathing even if you forget to look at the note.

Instead, you generally want to put up a robots.txt file to block crawling of some type. I may dig into a future article to examine when you might want to mix allow and disallow statements, but off the top of my head, there’s not a lot of reasons to do so.

You can change the default option to “Block all robots” easily enough. Do that, and you get the standard and familiar two line keep out code:

User-Agent: *
Disallow: /

The first line — User-Agent — is how you tell particular spiders or robots to pay attention to the following instructions. Using the wildcard — * — says “hey ALL spiders, listen up.”

The second line says what they can’t access. In this case, the / means to not spider anything within the web site. You know how pages within a web site all begin domain/something, like this:

http://website.com/page.html

See that / between website.com and page.html? Technically, that slash is the start of the URL. So if you disallow all pages beginning with a slash, you’re blocking all pages within the entire site.

Let’s move on from our mini-robots.txt 101 course. Maybe you only want to block Google. Well, the tool is supposed to make this type of thing easy, but I was perplexed. Step one is to either allow or block ALL robots. Then in Step 2, you decide if you want to block specific robots. So which do you go with in step 1, block all or none?

I figured you’d want to allow all robots, then believe the reassuring text next to that option that said “you can fine-tune this rule in the next step.” The problem is, I couldn’t. If I tried to block Googlebot, the instructions didn’t change. If I tried to choose, say, Googlebot-Mobile, same thing.

Eventually, I figured it out. If you decide to block specific spiders, you have to choose the spider, then specify also what you want to block in the “Files or directories” box, such as a particular file or directory. So say I kept all print-only versions of stories in a directory called /print. I’d enter that directory to get this:

User-Agent: *
Allow: /

User-Agent: Googlebot
Disallow: /print
Allow: /

The first part tells spiders they can access the entire site. As I said, this is entirely unnecessary, but you get it anyway. The second part says that Googlebot cannot access the /print area.

The tool lets you craft specific rules for these particular Google crawlers:

  • Googlebot
  • Googlebot-Mobile
  • Googlebot-Image
  • Mediapartners-Google
  • Adsbot-Google

I wish the names were accompanied by parenthesis quickly explaining what each crawler does, and what blocking them will do, say, something like this:

  • Googlebot-Mobile (allows or blocks content from Google mobile search)

Instead, you have to look through the various help files to understand what each does. Ironically, the older Analyze Robots.txt tool within Google Webmaster Tools DOES have these helpful explanations, so I expect they’ll migrate over.

You can also use the tool to enter a name for another crawler. The problem is, someone using this tool probably doesn’t know the crawler names out there that they want to block. I’d have given Google serious kudos points if they added some of the other major crawlers. But then again, if they had, no doubt someone would have accused them of trying to get people to block other search engines :)

Another thing that would have been nice was if people could have pasted full URLs into the box to have them converted. A site owner using this tool might not realize they need to drop the domain portion of a URL to block a particular page. But if you could paste something like this:

http://website.com/page-i-want-to-block.html

And have the tool automatically turn it into this:

User-Agent: *
Disallow: /page-i-want-to-block.html

After you make your file, upload it to the root directory of your web site. If you don’t know what that is, find someone who does! This is important. Google allows for subdirectories of web sites to be registered within Google Webmaster Tools. However, robots.txt files do NOT work on a subdirectory basis. They have to go at the root level of a web site. If you don’t put them there, then you won’t be preventing access to any part of the site. Remember, after you upload to the root level, you can go back into Google Webmaster Tools and use that aforementioned analysis tool to see if it is really blocking the pages you want to keep out.

Overall, I’m glad to see the new tool, and I imagine it will improve more over time to make it even more user friendly.

In related news, Google says that the Web Crawl diagnostics area now has a new filter letting you see only web crawl errors related to sitemaps you’ve submitted. Also, there have been some UI tweaks to the iGoogle gadgets from Webmaster Central that were rolled out last month.

For more about Google’s webmaster tools, be sure to check out the quick start guide they offer and see our Google Webmaster Central archives.

Article source- http://searchengineland.com/080327-173946.php

For more info please visit us at – SEO services & Software outsourcing



View My Stats